Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Technologies LLC vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Technologies LLC and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Technologies LLC holds $20.1M in lifetime obligations with a 93.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Technologies LLC Lifetime Spend: $20.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Dynamic Technologies LLC Recompete Win %: 93.4%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Dynamic Technologies LLC Top Agency: Department of Energy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Technologies LLC

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$20.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.2M
Recompete Win Rate:93.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):517311
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Dynamic Technologies LLC
UEI: Q1J9JNUM9X9T • Austin, TX
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX