Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Technologies LLC vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Technologies LLC and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Technologies LLC holds $18.3M in lifetime obligations with a 74.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Dynamic Technologies LLC Lifetime Spend: $18.3M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Dynamic Technologies LLC Recompete Win %: 74.7%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Dynamic Technologies LLC Top Agency: Department of the Army
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Technologies LLC

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$18.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.9M
Recompete Win Rate:74.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:5
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541310
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Technologies LLC vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence