Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION vs. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION and NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION: ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION holds $175.70B in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION records $125.27B with a 82.6% retention rate.

•ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $175.70B

•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $125.27B

•ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 80.3%

•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 82.6%

•ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$175.70B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$61.49B

Recompete Win Rate:80.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:21

Average Award Cycle:37 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512

Entity B

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$125.27B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$43.85B

Recompete Win Rate:82.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:134

Average Award Cycle:41 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512