Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION vs. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION and SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION: ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION holds $175.70B in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION records $114.88B with a 85.6% retention rate.
•ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $175.70B
•SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $114.88B
•ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 80.3%
•SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 85.6%
•ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
•SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$175.70B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$61.49B
Recompete Win Rate:80.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$114.88B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$40.21B
Recompete Win Rate:85.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512