Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION holds $91.1M in lifetime obligations with a 78.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION Lifetime Spend: $91.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION Recompete Win %: 78.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION Top Agency: Department of State
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$91.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$31.9M
Recompete Win Rate:78.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512