Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION and THE BOEING COMPANY: ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION holds $91.1M in lifetime obligations with a 78.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION Lifetime Spend: $91.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION Recompete Win %: 78.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION Top Agency: Department of State
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$91.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$31.9M
Recompete Win Rate:78.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512