Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. holds $1.41B in lifetime obligations with a 79.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. Lifetime Spend: $1.41B

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. Recompete Win %: 79.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC.

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.41B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$493.4M

Recompete Win Rate:79.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:1

Average Award Cycle:47 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512