Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. and THE BOEING COMPANY: EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. holds $1.41B in lifetime obligations with a 79.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. Lifetime Spend: $1.41B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. Recompete Win %: 79.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC. Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT GAITHERSBURG INC.
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.41B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$493.4M
Recompete Win Rate:79.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512