Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC and THE BOEING COMPANY: ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC holds $119.5M in lifetime obligations with a 87.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC Lifetime Spend: $119.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC Recompete Win %: 87.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$119.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$41.8M
Recompete Win Rate:87.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:2
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PERFORMANCE, LLC
UEI: N5FAKJH4DHA4 • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA