Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Frontier Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Frontier Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Frontier Consulting Group holds $16.0M in lifetime obligations with a 84.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Frontier Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $16.0M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Frontier Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 84.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Frontier Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Army

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Frontier Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.0M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.4M

Recompete Win Rate:84.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:19

Average Award Cycle:36 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):332994

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512