Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Frontier Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Frontier Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Frontier Engineering Group holds $398.3M in lifetime obligations with a 91.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Frontier Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $398.3M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Frontier Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 91.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Frontier Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Frontier Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$398.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$134.5M
Recompete Win Rate:91.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:188
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Frontier Engineering Group
UEI: 73A0K3ZZQ3H0 • Washington, NE
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX