Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Frontier Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Frontier Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Frontier Engineering Group holds $398.3M in lifetime obligations with a 91.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Frontier Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $398.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Frontier Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 91.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Frontier Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Frontier Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$398.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$134.5M
Recompete Win Rate:91.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:188
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Frontier Engineering Group
UEI: 73A0K3ZZQ3H0 • Washington, NE
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA