Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Frontier Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Frontier Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Frontier Engineering Group holds $40.5M in lifetime obligations with a 80.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Frontier Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $40.5M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Frontier Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 80.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Frontier Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Frontier Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$16.4M

Recompete Win Rate:80.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:15

Average Award Cycle:48 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):236220

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512