Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Frontier Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Frontier Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Frontier Engineering Group holds $23.1M in lifetime obligations with a 83.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Frontier Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $23.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Frontier Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Frontier Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Frontier Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$23.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.8M
Recompete Win Rate:83.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Frontier Engineering Group
UEI: 6VJDV716245P • Washington, NV
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX