Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Global Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Global Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Global Consulting Group holds $2.7M in lifetime obligations with a 76.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Global Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $2.7M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Global Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 76.5%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Global Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Global Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$2.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$683K
Recompete Win Rate:76.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:5
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Global Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence