Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Global Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Global Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Global Consulting Group holds $2.7M in lifetime obligations with a 76.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Global Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $2.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Global Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 76.5%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Global Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Global Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$2.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$683K
Recompete Win Rate:76.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:5
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Global Consulting Group
UEI: BZHULJ87N82J • Washington, UT
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA