Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Global Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Global Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Global Consulting Group holds $10.1M in lifetime obligations with a 95.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Global Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $10.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Global Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 95.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Global Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Global Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$10.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.0M
Recompete Win Rate:95.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Global Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence