Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Global Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Global Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Global Consulting Group holds $35.3M in lifetime obligations with a 88.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Global Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $35.3M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Global Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 88.7%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Global Consulting Group Top Agency: General Services Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Global Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$35.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.2M
Recompete Win Rate:88.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Global Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence