Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
GRANT THORNTON LLP vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between GRANT THORNTON LLP and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: GRANT THORNTON LLP holds $34.9M in lifetime obligations with a 80.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•GRANT THORNTON LLP Lifetime Spend: $34.9M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•GRANT THORNTON LLP Recompete Win %: 80.4%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•GRANT THORNTON LLP Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →GRANT THORNTON LLP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$34.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.2M
Recompete Win Rate:80.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512