Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

GUIDEHOUSE LLP vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between GUIDEHOUSE LLP and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: GUIDEHOUSE LLP holds $891.8M in lifetime obligations with a 83.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

GUIDEHOUSE LLP Lifetime Spend: $891.8M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
GUIDEHOUSE LLP Recompete Win %: 83.1%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
GUIDEHOUSE LLP Top Agency: Department of State
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

GUIDEHOUSE LLP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$891.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$312.1M
Recompete Win Rate:83.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:10
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
GUIDEHOUSE LLP vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence