Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
GUIDEHOUSE LLP vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between GUIDEHOUSE LLP and THE BOEING COMPANY: GUIDEHOUSE LLP holds $891.8M in lifetime obligations with a 83.1% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•GUIDEHOUSE LLP Lifetime Spend: $891.8M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•GUIDEHOUSE LLP Recompete Win %: 83.1%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•GUIDEHOUSE LLP Top Agency: Department of State
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →GUIDEHOUSE LLP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$891.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$312.1M
Recompete Win Rate:83.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:10
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512