Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

HAMILTON COMPANY vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between HAMILTON COMPANY and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: HAMILTON COMPANY holds $115.1M in lifetime obligations with a 93.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•HAMILTON COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $115.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•HAMILTON COMPANY Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•HAMILTON COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

HAMILTON COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$115.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$40.3M
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541715
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
HAMILTON COMPANY
UEI: LD1MPMMCBWJ9 • Washington, NV
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX