Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. holds $1.45B in lifetime obligations with a 79.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Lifetime Spend: $1.45B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Recompete Win %: 79.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND SPACE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.45B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$508.1M
Recompete Win Rate:79.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:40 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512