Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. and THE BOEING COMPANY: HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. holds $22.6M in lifetime obligations with a 83.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. Lifetime Spend: $22.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. Recompete Win %: 83.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Total Lifetime Obligations:$22.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.9M
Recompete Win Rate:83.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512