Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED and THE BOEING COMPANY: HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED holds $78.1M in lifetime obligations with a 87.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED Lifetime Spend: $78.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED Recompete Win %: 87.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$78.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$27.3M
Recompete Win Rate:87.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:55 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
HW CONSULTING, INCORPORATED
UEI: FC54LD4NY1P9 • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA