Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Hyperion Applied Sciences holds $39.2M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Hyperion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $39.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Hyperion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 88.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Hyperion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Defense
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$39.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.0M
Recompete Win Rate:88.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:14
Average Award Cycle:55 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336414
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Hyperion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence