Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Hyperion Applied Sciences holds $515.8M in lifetime obligations with a 78.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Hyperion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $515.8M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Hyperion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.3%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Hyperion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$515.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$151.0M
Recompete Win Rate:78.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:75
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541211
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Hyperion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence