Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Hyperion Consulting Group holds $30.3M in lifetime obligations with a 85.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Hyperion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $30.3M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Hyperion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 85.3%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Hyperion Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Justice
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$30.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.3M
Recompete Win Rate:85.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Hyperion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence