Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Hyperion Consulting Group holds $19.2M in lifetime obligations with a 76.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Hyperion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $19.2M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Hyperion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 76.8%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Hyperion Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$19.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.3M
Recompete Win Rate:76.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:55 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541211
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Hyperion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence