Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Hyperion Engineering Group holds $1.08B in lifetime obligations with a 94.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Hyperion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $1.08B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Hyperion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 94.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Hyperion Engineering Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.08B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$239.8M
Recompete Win Rate:94.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:70
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561320
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Hyperion Engineering Group
UEI: Q3LVPCYUJPUX • Washington, IL
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA