Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Hyperion Engineering Group holds $30.9M in lifetime obligations with a 92.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Hyperion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $30.9M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Hyperion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 92.5%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Hyperion Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$30.9M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.3M

Recompete Win Rate:92.5%

Active Prime Task Orders:15

Average Award Cycle:46 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):334220

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512