Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Hyperion Engineering Group holds $1.16B in lifetime obligations with a 85.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Hyperion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $1.16B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Hyperion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 85.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Hyperion Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.16B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$392.0M
Recompete Win Rate:85.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:146
Average Award Cycle:32 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488510
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Hyperion Engineering Group
UEI: KGLRPTSA9SQX • Washington, KS
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA