Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Hyperion Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Hyperion Engineering Group holds $21.9M in lifetime obligations with a 72.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Hyperion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $21.9M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•Hyperion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 72.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Hyperion Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Hyperion Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.6M
Recompete Win Rate:72.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:9
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):511210
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512