Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Hyperion Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Hyperion Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Hyperion Global Services holds $27.9M in lifetime obligations with a 95.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Hyperion Global Services Lifetime Spend: $27.9M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Hyperion Global Services Recompete Win %: 95.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Hyperion Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Hyperion Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$27.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.0M
Recompete Win Rate:95.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:9
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):339113
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Hyperion Global Services
UEI: 1LGNEYJ51K0X • Washington, AR
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA