Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES and THE BOEING COMPANY: INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES holds $2.10B in lifetime obligations with a 75.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES Lifetime Spend: $2.10B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES Recompete Win %: 75.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$2.10B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$733.3M
Recompete Win Rate:75.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:14
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES
UEI: JM98J68UPRK1 • Washington, VA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA