Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Consulting Group holds $5.0M in lifetime obligations with a 93.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Integrated Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $5.0M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Integrated Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 93.3%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Integrated Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$5.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$2.1M
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Integrated Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence