Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Integrated Consulting Group holds $29.3M in lifetime obligations with a 91.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Integrated Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $29.3M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Integrated Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.7%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Integrated Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$29.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.0M

Recompete Win Rate:91.7%

Active Prime Task Orders:9

Average Award Cycle:35 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512