Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Consulting Group holds $34.1M in lifetime obligations with a 94.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Integrated Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $34.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Integrated Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 94.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Integrated Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$34.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.8M
Recompete Win Rate:94.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Integrated Consulting Group
UEI: LQ9U8RHTJET5 • Washington, AR
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA
Integrated Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence