Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Integrated Consulting Group holds $26.0M in lifetime obligations with a 74.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Integrated Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $26.0M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Integrated Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 74.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Integrated Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$26.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.3M
Recompete Win Rate:74.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334418
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Integrated Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence