Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Integrated Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Consulting Group holds $26.0M in lifetime obligations with a 74.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Integrated Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $26.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Integrated Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 74.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Integrated Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Integrated Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$26.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.3M
Recompete Win Rate:74.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334418
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512