Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Engineering Group holds $19.6M in lifetime obligations with a 82.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Integrated Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $19.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Integrated Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 82.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Integrated Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$19.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.0M
Recompete Win Rate:82.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488510
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Integrated Engineering Group
UEI: SM4T6X8XHH2J • Washington, KS
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA