Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Engineering Group holds $20.7M in lifetime obligations with a 94.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Integrated Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $20.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Integrated Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 94.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Integrated Engineering Group Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$20.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.2M
Recompete Win Rate:94.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:10
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Integrated Engineering Group
UEI: VAZ8BZY66M1Y • Washington, NH
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA