Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Engineering Group holds $20.7M in lifetime obligations with a 94.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Integrated Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $20.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Integrated Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 94.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Integrated Engineering Group Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$20.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.2M
Recompete Win Rate:94.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:10
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Integrated Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence