Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Integrated Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Global Services holds $5.9M in lifetime obligations with a 84.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Integrated Global Services Lifetime Spend: $5.9M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Integrated Global Services Recompete Win %: 84.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Integrated Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Integrated Global Services
Total Lifetime Obligations:$5.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.4M
Recompete Win Rate:84.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:12
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488510
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512