Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Global Services holds $38.8M in lifetime obligations with a 83.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Integrated Global Services Lifetime Spend: $38.8M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Integrated Global Services Recompete Win %: 83.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Integrated Global Services Top Agency: Department of Justice
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$38.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$16.7M
Recompete Win Rate:83.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Integrated Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence