Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Integrated Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Integrated Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Integrated Global Services holds $1.02B in lifetime obligations with a 77.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Integrated Global Services Lifetime Spend: $1.02B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Integrated Global Services Recompete Win %: 77.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Integrated Global Services Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Integrated Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.02B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$458.0M
Recompete Win Rate:77.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:69
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Integrated Global Services
UEI: D0N9UCKMM4GD • Washington, NE
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA