Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $28.7M in lifetime obligations with a 78.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $28.7M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.9%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$28.7M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.3M

Recompete Win Rate:78.9%

Active Prime Task Orders:25

Average Award Cycle:58 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561210

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512