Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $28.7M in lifetime obligations with a 78.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $28.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.9%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$28.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.3M
Recompete Win Rate:78.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence