Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $327.1M in lifetime obligations with a 93.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $327.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 93.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$327.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$88.9M
Recompete Win Rate:93.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:187
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):339112
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Applied Sciences
UEI: 2AKC1D6NB57D • Washington, TN
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA