Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $24.8M in lifetime obligations with a 87.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $24.8M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 87.2%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.8M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.5M

Recompete Win Rate:87.2%

Active Prime Task Orders:16

Average Award Cycle:34 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):334519

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512