Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $24.8M in lifetime obligations with a 87.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $24.8M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 87.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.5M
Recompete Win Rate:87.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Applied Sciences
UEI: 2N7E1D3SB9WD • Washington, PA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA